Introduction
Here is a
brief survey of the well known answers to some of the big questions in life.
They are questions of philosophy rather than religion because they deal with
the natural world rather than the super-natural. For the most part they are
matters of perception with out any authoritative right answers.
What is perfection?
When talking about ideas and their
influence we find that there are three levels of reality. First the Divine
Real; is an idea in its perfect form, as it is understood by the gods. Second
the Ideal Concept; is an idea in its logical abstract form, as understood by
the mortal philosophers. Third the Practical Real; is an idea as it is used by
the common people in life.
For example: Justice. Divine justice considers
a question in great detail and is able to get to the truth of the matter. It
offers punishments and rewards that are fitting to the event in question.
Conceptual justice claims that only the guilty should be punished and that an
accused person should be considered innocent until proven guilty. Practical
justice as expressed by real laws and courts is constantly faced with tricky
situations, unknown factors, insufficient time and social pressures, thus it is
very difficult to provide good quality justice to all.
For a more lengthy examination of perfection
one must read from holy books of Bennatur:
Prince of perfection - who is peaceful and strait forward. He is
idealism and goodness personified. His basic philosophy is to look at the intention
and attempt of an action rather than the end results.
Is there such a thing
as the idea of progress on Carsis?
The Dwarves have preserved most of the
technology of the ancient time and have a written ( if somewhat limited )
record of all history. Political relations and placement of population centers
have changed over time, but the basic makeup of their societies and technology
has not. They would see change, not
progress in history.
The Elves have always maintained a low tech
level, living in harmony with nature. Their pattern of life has changed little
over time, although their relationships to neighbors have. Again, there is a
felling of change but not progress in history.
The Humans represent a different situation.
Their grasp of technology and civilized organization was seriously damaged when
the ancient catastrophe occurred. The past was nearly erased, as the struggle
for survival took center place in the lives of many generations. Eventually
they recovered and built new societies.
This series of events gives Humans the felling
that there is progress in history. They believe that things will get better,
more advanced, technology and social structures will lead to improvements in
quality of life. However, the march of technology is quite slow on Carsis. Few
inventions drastically alter the way people live within a single lifetime.
Of course the strongest support for the idea of
progress is often presented by clerics, such as Progresurus, who claim that all
history has a point. “As we follow the advice given by the gods about how to
live a good life, we built better societies. Eventually the perfect
civilization will emerge.” He said
Despite the evidence of progress many
sages, especially Elvin ones, claim that history has a patter much like that of
an individual’s life. All things, including nations, are born, to grow, become
strong, reproduce, then age and finally die. The rise and fall of civilizations
is expected.
Ways to view history
and current events.
Power Politics
This view concerns itself with the actions of
powerful men. It claims that a nation acts in accordance with the will of its
leader. Thus we must consider the mind of a leader to understand the activities
of a nation. Motives such as honor, lust, greed, love, and vengeance, all
figure prominently. There is the question of who gives his advice, but above
all, is the will and skill of the leader to make his desires felt in reality
that matter. Incompetent or lazy rulers accomplish little yet may cause the
downfall of their nations.
Economic Theory
This view concerns itself with the costs of
actions. It claims that the motive behind any reasonable action is an economic
one. It assumes that a cost – benefit analysis is done before any national
policy is implemented; although such an analysis may be faulty, leading to an
incorrect policy. In this theory, revenue and expense are the driving forces.
For any new expense a state must find a new source of income.
Cultural Conflict
This view concerns itself with the social
stress of relations between cultures. It claims that the actions of a leader
must be in keeping with the norms of his culture. A leader may be influenced by
outside ideas, but if he goes against tradition, a rebellion will result. According
to this theory, a culture holds beliefs which are incompatible with those of
another culture. Although there may be peaceful relations, there will be
permanent stress. Deliberate or accidental misunderstandings will then quickly
lead to war. Most typically will be the idea “They are not like us, so we can’t
trust them.”
Regarding Gender
Men and Women are different, physically and
mentally.
Because of these differences, certain social
roles have developed. Women are able to bear children, men are not. Women tend
to feel a strong attachment to their offspring and to children in general, men
have a lesser degree of these emotions. The task of bearing and caring for a
child is seen as woman’s prime role in most societies.
The idea of work is traditionally divided into
two categories; at home and away from home. Women with their devotion to
children are best suited to work at home, an environment that is generally
secure. Men with their more aggressive nature are better suited to work away
from home. Thus it is often claimed that the woman’s role is to maintain and
manage a home, while the man’s role it to provide for it and defend it.
The most important mental difference is man’s
aggressive nature combined with a tendency to quickly resort to physical action. Women in general are more passive and tend to
use indirect means of getting what they want. In simple terms, men prefer to
act, while women prefer to talk. While men usually see conflict as a welcome
test of their abilities, women tend to seek compromise situations that will
give them a sort of victory without unnecessary risk.
According to some thinkers; “These
facts should not be taken as proof of the inferiority of either gender.
Difference does not mean a distinction of better or worse.” Other thinkers are
more pragmatic, they claim; “Because of man’s tendencies he will dominate most
social organizations from the family to the nation. Women are thus placed into
an inferior role in life.”

No comments:
Post a Comment