Economics Theory on Carsis 201
Theory and
Reality
The accepted theory holds that
everything can have a value set in coins. However reality soon exposes a
practical problem. There are not enough coins in existence. With in the local
economy of a Barony (20x20 km area) we may find 5 large estates, 10 medium estates, 20 small estates; giving
us a total agricultural market value of 2,739,000 coins. That is a lot of
coins. Most regions do not have that many coins in circulation. How then does
the economy function?
First we need to
consider that there are several types of coins. All theory is given in the
lowest coinage value, the copper piece. There also exists the silver piece,
worth 10 coppers, and the gold piece, worth 100 coppers. A simple progression
of value, assuming the same weight for a coin is used.
Second it must be
noted that all coins are not the same size / weight. Many places produce a
double thickness silver piece worth 20 coppers, which are in common use and a
small gold bar worth 5,000 coppers, which are quite rare.
Returning to the
market for an example:
A farmer has 100,000
lbs of potatoes for sale. According to basic fare trade theory, he would sell
them in 20 lb basket for 1 coin each, earning 5,000 copper coins. That is a
cumbersome amount of cash to carry around. He could be paid 500 silver coins or
50 gold coins. In reality he normally sells by the bushel, an 80 lb measure
sold for 3 coins. Thus the potatoes would be sold as 1,250 bushels for 3,750
copper coins, or which would be paid in some combination of coinage.
Direct trade is not dead:
Most likely
some of the potatoes will be traded directly with craftsmen at the market for
items they produce. Some will be sold to residents of the town for cash. Some
will be traded with other farmers who offer different crops. Some will be sold
to merchants, who transport the produce to the big cities. Some may also be
sold to the less reputable “holders” merchants who are equipped to store
produce until a later date when the demand drives up the price.
Regarding
the reputable merchants
They make money if
they buy in bulk at a local market, transport the produce to a city and sell it
there. Their profits are fair because they add the value of transport to the
produce. But the business is risky; accidents can destroy goods and bandits can
run off with them. Typically a merchant will not simply trade in one commodity.
He will acquire goods in the city from craftsmen, bring them to the small town
market and offer them as part of the payment to the farmers for their produce. He
usually acquires the goods on credit; a promises to deliver a certain amount of
grain or other produce.
An element of barter
occurs as the merchant enters the market. Although the documents of fair trade
offer guide lines to what any product or service should be worth, nothing
compels the farmer to accept an item he does not want as payment. So the
merchant must make educated guesses about what will be desired.
The reputation of the
merchant is critical in two ways. First, he must be well known to the craftsmen
as they are extending credit to him, offering goods now and accepting payment
later. Second he must know and be known to the farmers, so he can guess what
they want and avoid lengthy haggling. A merchant who provides a wanted service
is a welcome sight.
Regarding the disreputable merchants
They are typically
called holders or hoarders because they do not provide a noticeable value
addition, such as transportation, to a product. They buy local crops at the end
of harvest time, when the farmers want to be rid of their surplus and will sell by the bushel. They hold onto the produce until late spring, when
most people, especially those in town, are running low on supplies. Then they
sell at above fair prices.
The service they
provide is not a welcome one, but it can be useful. It is better to pay double
the fair price than to go hungry. The claim made by these merchants is that
they invested money to build storage houses and they know the best storage
techniques, so they have put value into the produce just be keeping it safe.
The risks they take are that rotten food can not be sold, also that robbers and
rodents may diminish their supplies.
However logical these arguments are, holders seem to make money for
doing nothing and thus are not very popular people.
Back to the question of cash in the economy
Many transactions are
made item for item, based on the standard fair value of each item. For example;
the local brewer may trade a gallon keg for a basket of produce. In this way he
stocks up his kitchen by trading directly with the farmers. His coin profit comes from selling to the tavern, assuming he is not running the tavern
himself. A similar pattern exists for other local craftsmen like the black
smith and the miller. They provide goods or services in exchange for items. All
transactions regulated by the guide lines of fair trade, so there is little
actual bargaining or haggling involved.

No comments:
Post a Comment